|
|
|
|
|
by annableker
4964 days ago
|
|
That's what I did--voted for it, because it was packaged together with "human trafficking", the main advertised piece. I'm somewhat regretting voting for it now, after more careful research. The only "deal breaker" for me, at this point, is that this law (I think) doesn't take into account the difference in acts that constitute "sex offense"--i.e., peeing on the side of the highway and raping someone both fall under the same category here. So that poor dude that got taking a drunk leak might have to expose his screen names. |
|