|
|
|
|
|
by wolvoleo
80 days ago
|
|
Yes and the reversal of safety calculations really surprised me. "The orbiter has a total fail rate of one in 1000 so this individual part is higher than 1 in 10000", something like that. Where neither premise was actually tested or verified. Just specified on paper as a requirement and then used for actual safety calculations. I don't know how a big organisation can think like that. But I guess these calculations were ones out of millions of ones made for the project. |
|