|
|
|
|
|
|
by Aurornis
80 days ago
|
|
|
I'm not claiming to be able to spot 100% of LLM written output However the default tone and output style of Claude and ChatGPT are very obvious. > My recollection is whenever I've seen data on this--the educators who think they can spot students cheating--the conclusion is people are really bad at identifying LLM-generated content. If you can share that data we can discuss it, but there's nothing really to discuss here without a source Among people who review a lot of user-submitted content, it becomes easy to spot the consistent voice of LLM writing. Wikipedia has a full page on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing |
|
|