[classicpsy]

Mate I still didn't understand that.

stop hook forces the claude to run the existing tests. Fine if claude added a new feature but didn't created a test for it. It will wait for it to perform that action. Fine. We can adjust the complexitiy of hook scripts. That's ok.

Tell me if I'm wrong, I am understanding it more like a compiler like if the syntax is ok, just pass. Similarly here, if the test were ran, it will look for a marker file in /tmp, it found it, and pass.

I did not understood the part of tests. Maybe my question is more clear now.

[LatencyKills]

This is one of the simplest and most fundamental ways to manage Claude’s behavior. I genuinely can’t make it clearer. The issue you’re describing seems to center on situations where Claude becomes “stubborn” and doesn’t follow instructions.

When that happens, the solution is straightforward: create a hook script that explicitly enforces the behavior you want. By doing so, you remove ambiguity and leave Claude no option but to comply.

If you can share a specific case where Claude isn’t following your prompts, I can help you craft an appropriate hook to correct it.

[classicpsy]

Thanks for the pointer. For now I’ve fixed the issue. Your reply made me go through the hook script solution more carefully, and I’m exploring it now.