[mememememememo]

Sounds like you care about data stored on your filesystem! Take one step back and solve that problem. Use a proper isolated sandbox, e.g. Github workspace on an account that is working with a fork.

Care about the data in that workspace? Push it first.

Othwerwise it is a cat and mouse game of whackamole.

[throw5]

Does any one of this help me if Claude runs `git reset --hard`?

If I am working in a sandbox, I have uncommitted changes in a sandbox and if Claude runs `git reset --hard` on those uncommitted changes in the sandbox, I've got the same problem?

> Care about the data in that workspace? Push it first.

But you're changing the problem. If I push everything, then yeah I've got no problem. But between pushing one change and the next, you're gonna have uncommitted changes, won't you? and if Claude runs `git reset --hard` at that time, same problem, isn't it?

[mememememememo]

Ok I contest. If you are worried about it resetting it's own work then yes. Although just chuck the same prompt and you should get a similar result amirite? Maybe a better one lol!

Also you can instruct it to commit and push at every step too.