[balamatom]

>I think you want to say that human language is too ambiguous for clear communication between human and machine. [...]

If that is what I wanted to say, I figure I would not have had much difficulty with saying exactly it - and not something else.

Except I fail to see the purpose of making that statement.

Maybe to have some people say "it is true! I agree with what the balamatom is saying"?

Again - to what end? How would that agreement be of use to me?

Why say something which both speaker and listener have already heard a thousand times? To get a cracker and be called pretty?

And have I lost the author, or have I lost the reader, or we all so lost that it doesn't matter how lost each is? Maybe one day we will all become so lost that it will once again begin to matter where exactly we are! Counting on it.