[gruez]

>your ability to not address my argument main point is something to behold. can't tell if you're doing on purpose or not.

Or maybe you're just terrible at writing.

>if humans read my blog posts and then things without credit that would be fine.

I'm not sure how I (or anyone) was supposed to come away with this conclusion when you were writing stuff like:

"i'm ok with giving the recipe for free, i just want my name out there"

"the very human need to be recognized for something created"

"they want their name attached and their contribution recognized".

[GeoAtreides]

there is nothing contradictory in what i said, and if you weren't favoring a very literal interpretation of my argument you would agree.

but, in the spirit of critical reading education, what i meant is: human attention good, machine ingestion bad.