[pixl97]

>and not some more trustworthy source.

What is that more trustworthy source exactly? At least to me it feels like the internet age has eroded most things we considered trustworthy. Behind every thing humans need there is some company or person willing to sell out trustworthiness for an extra dollar. Consumer protections get dumped in favor of more profit.

LLMs start feeling more like a dummy than the amount of ill intent they get from other places. So yea, I can see how it happens to people.

[danny_codes]

Wikipedia is excellent.

[AnimalMuppet]

At the moment, maybe Google Search, throwing away the AI response at the top? Or Duck Duck Go, if you don't really trust Google?

I can see a day when even that won't be trustworthy, because too much AI slop output will wind up in the search corpus. But I don't think we're there yet.

[autoexec]

> At the moment, maybe Google Search, throwing away the AI response at the top? Or Duck Duck Go,

Even past the summary and the ads a huge amount of results that come back from both google and DDG are AI generated. It's sometimes harder to find a reliable source for information in search results these days than it was 20 years ago.

[salawat]

Google is NN's all the way down these days. There might still be an honest index under it all, but a truly accurate representation of the Web has been effectively outlawed in the U.S. since DMCA.