Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by drob518 80 days ago
This is going to be a strategic challenge for ARM unless they are going to focus on chips that nobody else wants to make. And given the AI focus, that doesn’t seem to be the case. I would think that the RISC-V folks would be salivating at the prospect of flipping some existing ARM licensees to RISC-V.
2 comments

Meta bought a RISC-V startup six months ago: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=meta+rivos

Guess at the end of the day, no-one ever got fired for building ARM.

Rivos is about making GPUs. It will be interesting to see how this all nets out.

It is going to be a huge 24 months for RISC-V. My biggest concern is that everybody will have already placed their bets before then.

Idk, it seems to me like the Rivos people are still doing their RISC-V CPU work.
focus on chips that nobody else wants to make

That's what happened here. Meta wants a Neoverse V3 CPU but no one will make it for them. So Arm has to make it.

I don’t believe that nobody else would build it for them. This chip is not purely custom to Meta, as I understand it. Rather, ARM is going to be selling it to others and entering the market for “AI chips,” which is surely a market that some other ARM licensees want to be in. So therefore, ARM is competing with its other licensees, and in a potentially very lucrative, leading edge market, which is never a great place for an IP-focused company to be. Qualcomm, for instance, is undoubtedly annoyed at this.
ARM does not have their own fab, someone else is doing the actual making. ARM helped Meta design the thing.
That’s overly pedantic.

Then you’d say that Apple doesn’t make their laptops. Foxconn does.

The kind of work ARM would do to “make” a chip themselves goes beyond just design. It’s synthesis, P&R, test, packaging (generally a different company than the fab), yield management, inventory/logistics, etc.