[kasey_junk]

Treason means something very specific in the US, intentionally. It’s one of only a couple of criminal acts defined in the constitution.

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

So no. None of those things is treason. This administration throws the word around loosely, like many authoritarian regimes, but the founders had direct experience with a dictator who used treason charges as a political weapon and tried to ensure that wouldn’t happen here.

[jfengel]

I do feel as if threats to apply the crime of treason while are, if not treasonous, crimes themselves. Threats are a criminal act, and there is a long precedent to disallow "I wasn't really gonna do it" as a defense.

[tptacek]

Only "true threats" are criminal acts; threats broadly understood to be rhetorical or implausible are protected speech.