[nofriend]

> Huh, why?

The opposite change was already justified, it would obviously be ridiculous to have to constantly rejustify every law in our society.

> They didn't change any laws, did they? So it was as legal earlier as it is now, isn't it? It's just that someone found the right loophole that was always there.

I do not know nor do I particularly care.

[eru]

> The opposite change was already justified, it would obviously be ridiculous to have to constantly rejustify every law in our society.

They didn't change any laws.