[spacebanana7]

It can be useful for insurance/hedging purposes.

For example if you're a European farmer it might be rational to protect yourself from fertiliser price swings by buying/shorting natural gas futures, derivates or long dated delivery contracts. Polymarket bets on specific geopolitical events are just another option for this, which can be attractive depending on the price.

Prediction markets have a pretty unique benefit in terms of offering political protection. For example if you're a DEI NGO it might have been worth making bets on Trump winning so you have enough funds to ride out measures that target your traditional funding sources from gov/corps/edu.

[kiliantics]

There are a lot of baked in assumptions here. For instance, as an extreme example, betting on nuclear war or climate collapse happening and then "winning" doesn't really provide you anything of much use in the society you will be living in after such events.

[spacebanana7]

Extreme events are always poorly priced in markets. For example, there's no point in making a trade for the S&P 500 falling by 90% because if it does we'll be in such a catastrophe that money doesn't matter any more.

Insurance / hedging is most useful in protecting you from realistic well defined risks that affect you personally but not the wider system.

[DeathArrow]

>Insurance / hedging is most useful in protecting you from realistic well defined risks that affect you personally but not the wider system.

But a powerful earthquake can't affect the wider system in a country? and yet, people do buy insurances for earthquakes.

[spacebanana7]

Perhaps I should’ve said financial system plus some system that allows you to spend money on things you’d like.

[appletrotter]

Very astute observation. Might I even add, as humans we never know when our last day could be. So I find it silly to gamble, since I could easily die in a car accident on my way to pick up my winnings.