[raverbashing]

Yes

I don't think I remember one case where jq wasn't fast enough

Now what I'd really want is a jq that's more intuitive and easier to understand

[latexr]

> Now what I'd really want is a jq that's more intuitive and easier to understand

Unfortunately I don’t recall the name, but there was something submitted to HN not too long ago (I think it was still 2026) which was like jq but used JavaScript syntax.