[edf13]

Nice - I do something similar in a semi manual way.

I do find Codex very good at reviewing work marked as completed by Claude, especially when I get Claude to write up its work with a why,where & how doc.

It’s very rare Claude has fully completed the task successfully and Codex doesn’t find issues.

[axldelafosse]

I created the first version of loop after getting tired of doing this manually!

[edf13]

I’m going to take a look today!

[nurettin]

Claude is also good at that. I made a habit of asking "are you sure?" after a complex task. It usually says it overlooked something.

[ctmnt]

I find both to be true. I use Claude for most of the implementation, and Codex always catches mistakes. Always. But both of them benefit from being asked if they’re sure they did everything.

[lancekey]

Do you see any benefit in doing this locally versus having Codex review the PR Claude generates?

[axldelafosse]

The feedback loop is faster. But PR reviews are still useful as they are multiplayer (meaning that you and another human reviewer can talk about a specific agent's comment directly on the diff, which is very useful sometimes).