[kakadu]

> There is a class of prediction markets that are useful

No there is not.

That's as damaging a statement as "soft" drugs or "problem" gambling.

Statements usured by corporate PR to set up a fake middle ground and delegate responsibility to the consumer for any "bad" behaviour.

[DirkH]

There literally are drugs vastly less addictive and harmful than others. So some designation of some as "soft" and others as "hard" is not unwarranted (though we can argue where that cutoff is) and anything that paints all drugs the same is a false equivalence that suspiciously appears more ideologically anti-drug driven rather than impartial evidence-driven.

Same goes for anyone saying all gambling is the same.