|
|
|
|
|
by ahhhhnoooo
83 days ago
|
|
> It's not hard to understand how badly this would turn out to be if the same sort of unscrupulous regime could just abuse this loophole to seek the same benefit. Surely this is something that can be addressed if it ever becomes a problem. Surely we don't need to write rules for scenarios that aren't causing issues... |
|
You're advocating to create pressure and incentives to commit this class of abuses, which have already been committed even at an industrial stage for decades, and your strategy is to ignore history and facts until the consequences of your actions catch up to you.
And all this in exchange for which tradeoff?
Even the fight against doping is far more proactive than what you are advocating.