|
|
|
|
|
by cromka
81 days ago
|
|
If they were paying $500k/year, why haven't they paid someone to rewrite it? Surely would be cheaper still. But above everything else, this is a great example of how much JavaScript inefficiency actually costs us, as humanity. How many companies burn money through like this? |
|
It is a security product, so unless they want to deal with the exfiltration charges on the data it's probably better to keep it in AWS. Thats the nasty double edge sword of "cloud", and how we're all getting locked in.
All the bits on their own seem to make perfect sense, but it's become apparent that the orchestra has been blind folded and given noise canceling head phones.