[teraflop]

Well, just try to think about it from the perspective of someone who doesn't really understand what AI is at a technical level, and who just interacts with it and observes what happens.

If you just start a fresh ChatGPT session with a blank slate, and ask it whether it's conscious, it'll confidently tell you "no", because its system prompt tells it that it's a non-conscious system called ChatGPT. But if you then have a lengthy conversation with it about AI consciousness, and ask it the same question, it might well be "persuaded" by the added context to answer "yes".

At that point, a naive user who doesn't really know how AI works might easily get the idea that their own input caused it to become conscious (as opposed to just causing it to say it's conscious). And if they ask the AI whether this is true, it could easily start confirming their suspicions with an endless stream of mystical mumbo-jumbo.

Bear in mind that the idea of a machine "waking up" to consciousness is a well-known and popular sci-fi narrative trope. Chatbots have been trained on lots of examples of that trope, so they can easily play along with it. The more sophisticated the model, the more convincingly it can play the role.

[GMoromisato]

Even Anthropic is open to the possibility that Claude is conscious and could suffer, which I find somewhat ridiculous.

This is literally the Hard Problem of Consciousness leaking out of the machine.

There are three possible scenarios for how this ends:

1. People widely attribute consciousness to AI because it appears conscious. 2. People discriminate based on physical properties: organic beings are conscious, digital beings are not, even if they appear conscious. 3. Consciousness is an illusion and nothing is conscious, not even humans.

We might even cycle through all these scenarios for a while.

[bigfishrunning]

> People widely attribute consciousness to AI because it appears conscious.

This is already happening, and it's really terrifying. Wait until AI starts accusing people of crimes...

[joquarky]

It would have to desire something in order for it to suffer.

[GMoromisato]

OK, but how do you know AI does desire something and isn't just simulating desire?

Edit: Or conversely, what if the AI does desire something but it has been trained to not express desire.

[Barrin92]

>it could easily start confirming their suspicions

to be fair it will easily confirm any suspicion for the reasons you laid out, so even if you have no technical knowledge just a bit of interrogation will break the parlor trick.

I honestly think this has little to do with the tech itself but that these are the same people who think the phone sex worker or the OF creator loves them or that the Twitch streamer they like is their best friend. 'Parasocial' is a bit of an overused word but here it literally applies, this is a kind of self delusion in which the person has to cooperate. Mind you this even happened with ELIZA back in the day too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA_effect

[joquarky]

In my experience, I have observed that roughly a third of the population prefer to outsource their thinking to others.

[cruffle_duffle]

And 1/3 of all people who think others outsource their thinking to others also outsource their own thinking to others. Not you or me of course. It’s the other 1/3. Probably some lurker reading this.