[microtonal]

Oh, please, stop this tired ‘victim of corrupt bureaucrats‘ framing.

People have real choice in EP elections. There are parties that will always stand up for citizens’ rights. If they had enough seats, they could have voted this item off the agenda.

Yet, people continue to choose the same conservatives and radical right over and over again, because they are enraged about immigrants and identity politics. Blame the voters.

[modo_mario]

Why continue with the increased migration that the majority of the population has generally opposed then? One could have avoided those discussion points.

Also what you group as the radical right doesn't tend to be supportive of this idea. They full well know they are at times at the receiving end of web control legislation and drives atm. Same for 'radical left' groups.

It's the conservatives that at times make some fuzz about migration to draw votes from the former whilst keeping said migration going since it favours some of the companies they (and a load of other established parties) draw support from.

[rolandog]

Yes, there's lots of blame to pass around; but the system does reward corporate psychopaths which leaves US citizens having to choose — as South Park aptly put it — between a douche and a turd sandwich.

[kuerbel]

There is a famous German comedian that invented a figure known as "The Kangaroo". It once said:

"Whether left-wing or right-wing terrorism – I see no difference there."

"Yes, yes," calls the kangaroo, "the ones set foreigners on fire, the others cars. And cars are worse, because it could have been mine. I don't own any foreigners."