| Drawing a false equivalence between the internet and literal chemical poisons that aren't safe at any dose, cause severe physical addictions that take away choice to stop at best, and disable and kill millions of people every year at worst, like alcohol or cigarettes, is a little too on the nose. At some point, you have to ask how much of the rhetoric is driven by hysteria and moral panic and how much of it is driven by what the actual evidence shows. From the Guardian[1]: > Social media time does not increase teenagers’ mental health problems – study > Research finds no evidence heavier social media use or more gaming increases symptoms of anxiety or depression > Screen time spent gaming or on social media does not cause mental health problems in teenagers, according to a large-scale study. > With ministers in the UK considering whether to follow Australia’s example by banning social media use for under-16s, the findings challenge concerns that long periods spent gaming or scrolling TikTok or Instagram are driving an increase in teenagers’ depression, anxiety and other mental health conditions. > Researchers at the University of Manchester followed 25,000 11- to 14-year-olds over three school years, tracking their self-reported social media habits, gaming frequency and emotional difficulties to find out whether technology use genuinely predicted later mental health difficulties. From Nature[2]: > Time spent on social media among the least influential factors in adolescent mental health From the Atlantic[3] with citations in the article: > The Panic Over Smartphones Doesn’t Help Teens, It may only make things worse. > I am a developmental psychologist[4], and for the past 20 years, I have worked to identify how children develop mental illnesses. Since 2008, I have studied 10-to-15-year-olds using their mobile phones, with the goal of testing how a wide range of their daily experiences, including their digital-technology use, influences their mental health. My colleagues and I have repeatedly failed to find[5] compelling support for the claim that digital-technology use is a major contributor to adolescent depression and other mental-health symptoms. > Many other researchers have found the same[6]. In fact, a recent[6] study and a review of research[7] on social media and depression concluded that social media is one of the least influential factors in predicting adolescents’ mental health. The most influential factors include a family history of mental disorder; early exposure to adversity, such as violence and discrimination; and school- and family-related stressors, among others. At the end of last year, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine released a report[8] concluding, “Available research that links social media to health shows small effects and weak associations, which may be influenced by a combination of good and bad experiences. Contrary to the current cultural narrative that social media is universally harmful to adolescents, the reality is more complicated.” [1] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/jan/14/social-media-t... [2] https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-023-00063-7 [3] https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2024/05/candi... [4] https://adaptlab.org/ [5] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31929951/ [6] https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-023-00063-7#:~:text=G... [7] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32734903/ [8] https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/27396/Highlights_... |
I can do the same if I want the other way. But it's not worth my time.