Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bandrami 89 days ago
Surprisingly no; it's pretty much a money sink where everybody goes bankrupt after a couple of years. It's why it's attractive to money launderers.
1 comments

I'm not sure that's true for onlyfans, which seems to have been highly profitable until the sudden death of its founder.
Excellent point: I'm talking about pornography 1.0, as it were.
1.0 should be attributed to pornography _before_ online distribution, and I suspect that was pretty profitable
Isn't 1.0 before _photography_ rather?
Drawings then?
Live action