[52-6F-62]

I think you should focus on the claims in this article. There are plenty of principles espoused within.

Smearing his character without directly addressing those just stinks the place up.

[estimator7292]

There's throwing mud and then there's pointing out the mud already flung all over the walls

[52-6F-62]

And yet, the figures are the figures.

I don't trust anonymous online mudslingers when I've seen the salaries of some of the midlevel AI roles. It all stinks.

Worse yet: this person points to one article he disfavours and uses that as sufficient context to slander. And what is being called mud, on the writer's part, I see as just a little dust.

It stinks. Answer the figures.