|
|
|
|
|
by cheesecompiler
91 days ago
|
|
> It's why for example occupy wallstreet was such a laughable failure. This claim is enormous. I would instead argue that the movement lacked cohesiveness because it basically complained about too large a set of (correctly identified as interconnected) issues and lost momentum because the surface was too large. That said, I agree w your point about a face being important. Even in software, where tech can speak for itself, we see this heavily: Torvalds, Matsumoto, van Rossum, Jobs, |
|