[donkeybeer]

Would you be asking about intent if the end result of some "well intentioned" program was the murder of thousands of jews and terrorism all over Israel? Do you ask about intent for example when speaking of the deaths caused by well intentioned Soviet communism?

And I have given a much longer list than just the contras, where you can't even hide behind "but the origins were noble", they supported already terroristic entities.

[dotancohen]

I'm not hiding behind anything, I'm asking about the only notable example you gave with a link to more specific information. I'm actually learning - that's probably the problem. People on the America-Israel side are willing to ask questions and learn. People on the Muslim axis side find the idea of asking questions and learning so foreign that you don't even recognize it.

And yes, of course, when we study e.g. the German genocide of Jews we ask about intent. The Yad Vashem museum is all about examining the intent - you should go visit. One of the first exhibits is a Deutschmark restamped with a higher denomination, demonstrating the unbearable inflation that the German people were suffering prior to WWII. And the reasons for that suffering are explained as well. As I remember it, the major contributor was the Treaty Of Versailles, which mandated far too heavy war reparations against Germany.

And regarding the Soviets, are you joking? Yes, of course the reasons are discussed. How else does anybody learn a lesson? Have you seriously not studied history at all, to insinuate that one does not ask why?

[donkeybeer]

It is very clear why I asked, because for good reasons you would not accept the "original intent" that led to these massacres the way you were wondering about America's "original intent" regarding Contra and other terrorist groups