[afishhh]

> [..] only a mistake a human would make. Had I run my hand-written comment through a proofreading clanker [..]

That's true, and I should've been less rude in my previous comment. Sorry.

(Though note `nix eval` would've sufficed, no need for the probabilistic kind of clanker)

> Yet in the AI world, you demand more from humans.

But this isn't true. In my opinion `learning >> depending on an LLM` and my gripe is that it seems like the former is being displaced by the latter. In the pre-AI world I would've known that the person making the mistake wasn't making it because they outsourced their skill.

So I'm not, in fact, demanding anything more than in the pre-AI world.