|
|
|
|
|
by rdl
4968 days ago
|
|
There is structural favoritism, if not nepotism, in the federal system. The byzantine bidding process, requirements, etc. mean only either very large companies or very specialized companies tend to go for direct government contracts. Plus, even in cases where they are initially assigned fairly, they become a prime contractor and can be gatekeepers on every other aspect of the system. Even if their decisions are then not made on profit motives, they're not made on "best interest of the customer", either -- it's about reducing risk (of all kinds) vs. delivering the best expected product to the customer. |
|
Big organizations have transaction costs associated with them. That's kind of inevitable. But the question is whether eliminating a few billion here and there in transaction costs is worth forgoing potentially huge benefits from public/private partnerships.