Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by h4ch1 89 days ago
How does this compare to WXT[0]? I recently built a new tab extension[1] which uses quite a few permissions and browser APIs and building for Chrome and Firefox was a non-thought with how seamless compilation and distribution was.

It even separates the built extension code and the source and packages it nicely for firefox's review process.

[0] https://wxt.dev [1] https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/commander/pgfpnakgi...
1 comments
Valodim 89 days ago
There is a faq entry about that on tfa. The main differences are use of rsbuild (not a big diff down the line I expect, since vite uses rolldown now), and design to accommodate llm agentic development.
link
h4ch1 89 days ago
I did read that LLM generated paragraph but I was thinking there was some architectural difference/some improvement to existing tooling.

I don't mean to sound too dismissive but just slapping on rsbuild and well formatted errors + llms.txt doesn't seem that useful?

link
gxy5202 88 days ago
Yes, the overall framework design is different. This isn't just a superficial Vibe coding project (although AI was used in its development), but rather the result of my long-term experience developing browser plugins. Incidentally, I'm also the author of the browser extension Video Roll (https://videoroll.app). The main differences are as follows: 1. First, it's based on Rsbuild. If you install it via `pnpm create addfox-app`, you can quickly integrate unit tests (Rstest) and analytics reports (Rsdoctor), and use it simply with `addfox test` and `addfox dev --report`. 2. The extension supports three paradigms for entry point identification: first, automatic file-based identification (which needs to follow AddFox rules); second, it supports directly writing the source file address in various fields of the manifest (e.g., `background.service_worker: 'myBackground.ts'`); and third, it supports custom entries. 3. For automatic browser startup, a default address is set for most Chromium-based browsers (if no custom address was selected during browser installation), so you don't need to configure it to start automatically (supports Vivaldi, Opera, Arc, Yandex, etc.). 4. Using the Rsbuild plugin, if --debug is enabled, error monitoring code will be injected in dev mode, which will output errors such as content_script and background to the terminal, making it easy to directly copy and tell the AI without having to open the browser's devtools. 5. llms.txt/meta.md/error.md were generated, containing basic source information for the project, including the entry file, version used, framework, etc. These files will be useful if you are using Agent in conjunction with Skills for development.

I agree that Vite and Rsbuild are just choices of build tools, and the difference in development experience may not be significant.

AddFox is not a perfect framework and is still in a very early stage. WXT and Plasmo are both excellent; you just need to find the one that suits your needs. Thank you very much for trying it and providing feedback.

link