[Mogzol]

All your comments are painting archive.today as an innocent victim in all this, but in addition to the DDoS, they have been caught modifying archived pages as well as sending actual threats to Patokallio [1] which in my opinion seem far worse than the "doxxing".

Just the fact alone that they modified archived pages has completely ruined their credibility, and over what? A blog post about them that (a) wasn't even an attack, it is mostly praising archive.today, and (b) doesn't reveal any true identities or information that isn't already easily accessible.

From my perspective at least, archive.today seems like the unhinged one, not Patokallio.

[1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-a...

[wl]

Which pages have they been caught modifying? And where's the evidence? I've seen this accusation multiple times but never with concrete details.

[echoangle]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment...

Under „Altering of archived pages“

[BoingBoomTschak]

This is quite scary, even if I'm a bit wary of accusation coming from this crowd notorious for having their own cabal(s).