[Sytten]

I really wish people would stop using the language as an argument and that commenter would also move on to a more interesting debate.

In your discussion the first comment from an ex kuzu dev made an excellent point that rust for databases in an excellent language to ship faster with confidence while reducing real problems of concurrency and corruption.

At some point it becomes intellectual dishonesty to dismiss a language because of vibes instead of merit.

[adsharma]

I didn't dismiss the language. I called it a north star. Rust is still the best option if you desire memory safety.

But rewriting a complex working piece of software in Rust is not trivial. Having an incremental path (where only parts are rewritten in Rust and compatible with C++ code) would be a good path to get there.

Also open to new code and extensions getting written in Rust.