Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Tarq0n 84 days ago
I don't like the "those in power" framing because it implies that they all participated and that such a homogenous group even exists.
2 comments

In the USA it literally is two homogenous groups though? One of which is majorly complicit in covering up the files, against their constituents’ wishes.
I wouldn't even call them two groups. It's just one group ostensibly and publicly split in half, but it's still one group that intermingles behind the courtains.
I would say both parties are complicit at this point.

Keep in mind Epstein died in 2017. We had two GOP terms and one Democrat term from then to now.

With what we know from the files that have been released thus far (and how obviously the worst if it has either been shredded or will never see the light of day), the fact they refused to release/prosecute those implicated tells you all you need to know.

Yes, and many people have an extreme incentive to retreat to that framing because

* In 2024, they had a choice between pedophiles and not pedophiles and chose the pedophiles.

* In 2020, they had a choice between pedophiles and not pedophiles and chose the pedophiles.

* In 2016, they had a choice between pedophiles and not pedophiles and chose the pedophiles.

There was plenty of evidence of this association in 2016 (bragging about creeping into Ms Teen USA dressing rooms, bragging about being Epstein's best friend in the same sentence as acknowledging he's a pedo, victim testimony under oath that he diddled kids, etc etc), so "I didn't know" isn't an excuse if they cared one iota about the children at any step of the way.

It should be good news that the powerful pedophiles are largely (but not exclusively) concentrated in one party, but those who put them in power will do anything to avoid admitting culpability.