|
|
|
|
|
by nickpsecurity
87 days ago
|
|
There's a lot of stuff with basic errors in peer reviewed journals. Things also can get rejected for anything from formatting to politics. I like Arxiv better. I get the paper, know it's probably not reviewed (like in many journals), and review it if I want to. I used to ise Citeseerx, too, to get tons of CompSci papers. Even better, OpenReview might have some good observations. |
|