|
|
|
|
|
by fc417fc802
89 days ago
|
|
> but of course they never had a ton of those to start with. Really? The vast majority of weapons in the US are semi-auto so I find this difficult to believe. > the majority of guns Afgan insurgents had were 60 year old bolt-actions Were they? I would expect they were AK-47 and similar although I've never looked into it. |
|
Extrapolating from experience in the USofA to other countries in the world is generally not a good move.
The actual numbers, from the time, suggest maybe 10-15% of guns in Australia were "self loading"
( 20% of guns purchased back, not all were semi-automatic, a good many were old unwanted guns that now faced a registration fee if kept )
From a US academic type study that looked at the Australian (and other) gun buyback scheme post Port Arthur.
~ https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/g/files/litvpz3631/files/pro...( Note: I skimmed it, it looks more or less okay, several things caught my eye as problematic but the above passage looks pretty ballpark.
Further: I'm having busy days ATM - if I can claw out the time I might loop back to give a longer comment / reply to your upthread question(s) )