|
|
|
|
|
by Seattle3503
83 days ago
|
|
> I'm hopeful that improvements in LLMs mean we can ditch ORMs (under the guise that they are quicker to write queries and the inbetween mapping code with) and instead make good use of SQL to harness the powers that modern databases provide. Maybe we can ditch active models like those we see in sqlalchemy, but the typed query builders that come with ORMs are going to become more important, not less. Leveraging the compiler to catch bad queries is a huge win. |
|
My experience with something like the latest Claude Code models these days has been that they are pretty good at SQL. I think some combination of LLM review of SQL code with smoke tests would do the trick here.