[prodigycorp]

There are many reasons to make fun of Cursor. However, one of the things get right is their autocomplete model.

Are there any open models that come close? Why doesnt OAI or Anthropic dedicate some resources to blowing Cursor's model out of the water? Cursor's completion model is a sticking point for a lot of users.

[druskacik]

I agree, their autocomplete (tab) model is the best, but recently I realised I am using it less and less - the new models are so good that I mostly just do agentic coding, and I do very little changes in the codebase by myself. This is probably a general trend and if the usage of autocomplete models is dying out, it's understandable the companies are not investing resources into it.

[seunosewa]

Antigravity has an autocomplete model too. Based on Windsurf's, I guess.

[harmonic18374]

Absolutely not. Windsurf also just stole an open source model, there’s almost zero chance Google is using that under the hood.

[olejorgenb]

The model is great. The UX is ~~horrible~~ annoying...

[Tadpole9181]

Don't get me started. For every half-decent choice, there's a multitude of insane choices. After all this time they still don't have side-by-side review.

Equally as annoying, the break from VSCode is horrible. Having to use a separate registry, not having basic settings sync, the delay behind mainline VSCode updates.

Then, it's just plain buggier than others. The agent terminal just doesn't work semi-regularly, it doesn't like listing directories in the @, the SSH plugin crashes every other time it tries to connect, undoing agent work undoes edits I made in unrelated files sometimes. Sometimes updates just regress performance hard for seemingly no reason.

I also noticed the token use is wildly less efficient than CC or Codex these days. After almost no time at all it's up to 100,000 tokens and they're charging $1 per request for Sonnet. Side-by-side, Cursor spent $17 in the same time CC spent $4. Which is bizarre to me, since they advertise how their indexing and semantic search is more token efficient?

The autocomplete model was the only reason I stayed as long as I did. I wish there was a VSCode equivalent.

[olejorgenb]

Well, the UI as a whole is ok to me (except the parts which is way too volatile). I was talking about the UX of the autocomplete model. The model are very often spot on and fast, but it's impossible to properly configure it to be less in your face. Making it basically useless for day-to-day development.

[g947o]

Most companies don't do auto competition these days, including some that just recently stopped offering completion.

Which I find very unfortunate. There are so many cases, especially in proprietary codebases with non standard infrastructure, where good autocomplete is much better than "agentic" edits that produce nothing but slop which takes longer to clean up.