|
|
|
|
|
|
by 12_throw_away
89 days ago
|
|
|
> his personal theory of copyright went something like "if it doesn't have a license, then it's obviously public domain" I mean philosophically and morally, sure, one can take that position ... but copyright law does not work like that, at least not for anything published in the US after 1989 [1]. [1] https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ03.pdf |
|
|