“Each state should thus develop a concrete and effective policy to make the Internet widely available, accessible, and affordable to all segments of population.”
This can imply more than negative rights, in certain cases, but certainly not "free internet for everyone".
Interesting. It's always important when talking about "rights" to distinguish between negative and positive rights. Thanks for giving me a more fleshed out version there.
Not necessarily. Human infants have rights even if they are orphans with unknown family lineage. I don't think anyone wants to grant Dolphins the right to vote either. Just some basic protections, such as the right not to be killed without proper justification.