|
|
|
|
|
by tosti
93 days ago
|
|
Damn. I feel old and must've missed that boat. Several other boats too, I guess. Here I was thinking 16GiB is pretty good. I get to compile LibreOffice in an afternoon. QtWebEngine overnight. Doesn't 128GiB make rowhammer much more feasible? You'd have 32GiB per DIMM. Oh well |
|
The effectiveness of rowhammer depends on how well the manufacturer implemented target row refresh. But the internal ECC on DDR5 should help defend against it somewhat.
Personally I've been in the 24-32GiB range since 2013, and that's despite the fact that I'm still on DDR3.