Typing a description of an image is comparable to finding a button in a menu regarding ease/enablement. The difference is actually that Grok decides explicitly to not add even simple (if imperfect) guards, which requires no real burden on their part, which is morally and spiritually hideous.
It really is not the same at all. One is purely from the users mind and the other is an explicit part of the product. Photoshop could also add simple guards too, but this type of authoritarian is not appreciated by users.
>I hope they experience consequences.
I hope people who want a censored model can use one and people who want uncensored models can use uncensored ones.
And it had blatantly insufficient safety guarding that. I saw photos of 4th graders, labeled accordingly, that Grok happily modified. Given the model does have access to the text content of posts it's replying to, that's wildly negligent. This is not a simple brush tool we're talking about, and refusing requests to strip clothes off people is one of the most basic measures that could be taken here.