[GermanJablo]

Author of DocNode here. Yes, it’s still early days. But it’s a very robust library that I don’t expect will go through many breaking changes. It has been developed privately for over 2 years and has 100% test coverage. Additionally, each test uses a wrapper to validate things like operation reversibility, consistency across different replicas, etc.

DocSync, which is the sync engine mainly designed with DocNode in mind, I would say is a bit less mature.

I’d love it if you could take a look and see if there’s anything that doesn’t convince you. I’ll be happy to answer any questions.

[MrJohz]

I've looked through the site, and right now it's probably the thing I'd try out first, but my main concerns are the missing documentation, particular the more cookbook-y kinds of documentation — how you might achieve such-and-such effect, etc. For example, the sync example is very terse, although I can understand why you'd like to encourage people to use the more robust, paid-for solution! Also just general advice on how to use DocNode effectively from your experience would be useful, things like schema design or notes about how each operation works and when to prefer one kind of operation or structure over another.

All that said, I feel like the documentation has improved since the last time I looked, and I suspect a lot of the finer details come with community and experience.

[GermanJablo]

Thanks! I've recently made some improvements to the documentation. I agree the synchronization section could be improved more. I'll keep your feedback in mind. If you'd like to try the library, feel free to ask me anything on Discord and I'll help you.