|
|
|
|
|
|
by adgjlsfhk1
91 days ago
|
|
|
IMO that algorithm is barely a sieve. It is technically pareto optimal, but it seems like in practice it would just end up worse than either an optimized segmented sieve (it is ~log(n)^2 slower) or an O(1) memory method (probable prime test followed by a deterministic prime test) depending on how large and how wide the numbers you're testing are. |
|
|