|
|
|
|
|
|
by theamk
96 days ago
|
|
|
nah, it's plain AI stupidity, last paragraph tells it all. > Is this a fork or slop-fork? > Originally, I thought it's a proper fork using the original code-base. But given that the reasons for the fork seem to be largely LLM hallucinated, I think it counts as a slop-fork. (Plus, their scraper always obeys robots.txt. If every scraper was like that, no one would ever need their anti-scraper solution) |
|
|