[m-hodges]

Should art not of a point of view?

[radiator]

That is the whole point. Since decades, it has a single point of view, failing to represent the majority of the people.

[padjo]

I think you need to get out more if you really believe all movies have the one point of view

[manphone]

And what point of view does all art have now?

[MagicMoonlight]

That smugness is the exact point of view we’re talking about

[alternatetwo]

I'm confused what you mean by "single point of view" and "the majority of the people". Please elaborate.

[jimbo808]

It's your point of view.

[dmitrygr]

> Should art not of a point of view?

It can, sure. However, I will not pay to be lectured to on topics I have no interest getting lectured on. I'll keep my money, they can keep the sermon. Let's see who has more to gain from listening to the other. If they want my money, what I want to hear/see matters a whole lot more than what they want to preach to me.

They simply forgot the golden rule: he who has the gold -- makes the rules. Let them rediscover it.

[gzread]

Some is reasonable and then some is obviously just what rich people want you to think. Like America paid Hollywood a lot to always show the US armies being macho and always on the right side of wars.

[ludicrousdispla]

Should a sentence have a verb?

[christophilus]

Not all sentences.

[khazhoux]

Not always, no

[m-hodges]

You caught my typo. Gold medal.

[nout]

Absolutely!