|
|
|
|
|
by foltik
96 days ago
|
|
Because (imo) the goal should be to minimize overall complexity. Pulling in XML and all of its additional complexity just to get a (debatably) cleaner way to express tagged unions doesn’t seem like a great tradeoff. I also don’t buy the degenerate argument. XML is arguably worse here since you have to decide between attributes, child nodes, and text content for every piece of data. |
|
To get better than XML, I think you're looking at something closer to a Haskell- or LISP-embedded DSL, with obvious trade-offs when it comes to developer ecosystems and interoperability.