[Saline9515]

Common citizens aren't supposed to be blockwarts judging who deserves or not their money.

> But we can't protect everyone from their feelings.

We can protect ourselves from the feeling of others by not sharing this data.

> equal tasks very different salaries

Unless you are an unqualified factory worker on a line with quantifiable output, in a service economy "equal tasks" are highly subjective.

> This is handled by you letting the trainer know in private, and he will discretely handle it.

Maybe the poor kid would rather not tell the trainer that he is poor and face paternalistic attitudes? And the rich kid wouldn't be reminded all the time that he is guilty of having richer parents? Add race/migration and you'll quickly tolerate bullying because of "social reasons".

https://nordictimes.com/the-nordics/sweden/bullying-doubled-...

[Epa095]

As I said above, I explain the cultural norms making it seen as acceptable. I am not trying to convince you, and I am certainly not interested in a bunch of random tangental discussions.

  Maybe the poor kid would rather not tell the trainer that he is poor and face paternalistic attitudes? And the rich kid wouldn't be reminded all the time that he is guilty of having richer parents? Add race/migration and you'll quickly tolerate bullying because of "social reasons".

It would be the parrent who ask the trainer to have it waived, not the kid. No kid, rich or poor, would know if they received help in paying the bill or buying equipment. The whole point of the example was exactly that while peoples contribution is public, their requirement for support is not, so there would be no cultural acceptance for the arguement "since taxes are open so should healtcare-usage". And again, this is a explanation of the cultural context, it is irrelevant if you feel like that culture is good or bad.