|
|
|
|
|
|
by jhgb
97 days ago
|
|
|
If you want to make ultra-complicated clients, I assume that's what WebAssembly is heading towards. And it doesn't limit you to a poorly evolved language that wasn't intended for ultra-complicated software in the first place, or even force you to use that poorly evolved language on a server if you need to run the same logic in both places. |
|
|
It was originally about build steps but now you're talking about it's design.
And your only response is to use a technology years away from being practical for most web apps?