Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by browningstreet 105 days ago
Gavin said he's open to amending the law. I hope someone's taking him up on that..
2 comments

Yeah, I think the idea of the law is fine. If you imagine "Operating System" to mean "things like Windows and iOS, or Desktop install of Fedora", "Application Store" to mean "Microsoft Store or AppStore or the like" and "Application" to mean "Word and Doom and stuff like that" then it's fine. Especially if you keep in mind that there isn't any actual verification of the age, it's simply set by whoever sets up the account

Most of the issues only arise because in the bill "operating system", "covered application store" and "application"/"developer" have very loose definitions that match lots of things where the law doesn't make sense.

Gavin doesn't make laws and should have vetoed this one.
Why, what's wrong with it?
for one, it bans linux as these distros do not have centralized user account data bases and the resources to comply
Laws get made by whomever takes Gavin to the most dinners at the French Laundry. Don’t like this law? Good luck - reservations are booked out 6 months in advance.