Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by CraigJPerry 104 days ago
I've had good success with something along these lines but perhaps a bit more raw:

    - claude takes a -p option
    - i have a bunch of tiny scripts, each script is an agent but it only does one tiny task
    - scripts can be composed in a unix pipeline
For example:

    $ git diff --staged | ai-commit-msg | git commit -F -
Where ai-commit-msg is a tiny agent:

    #!/usr/bin/env bash
    # ai-commit-msg: stdin=git diff, stdout=conventional commit message
    # Usage: git diff --staged | ai-commit-msg
    set -euo pipefail
    source "${AGENTS_DIR:-$HOME/.agents}/lib/agent-lib.sh"
    
    SYSTEM=$(load_skills \
        core/unix-output.md \
        core/be-concise.md \
        domain/git.md \
        output/plain-text.md)
    
    SYSTEM+=$'\n\nTask: Given a git diff on stdin, output a single conventional commit message. One line only.'
    
    run_agent "$SYSTEM"
And you can see to keep the agents themselves tiny, they rely on a little lib to load the various skills and optionally apply some guard / post-exec validator. Those validators are usually simple grep or whatever to make sure there were no writes outside a given dir but sometimes they can be to enforce output correctness (always jq in my examples so far...). In theory the guard could be another claude -p call if i needed a semantic instruction.
2 comments

Do you have examples of these commit messages? I have yet to see an AI write a good commit message. At least when compared to good commit messages -- if it just does better than "wip" or "fix stuff" that's not a high bar.
My skills/domain/git.md looks like this:

    Context: You are working with Git repositories.
    - Commit messages follow Conventional Commits: type(scope): description
    - Types: feat, fix, docs, refactor, test, chore, ci, perf
    - Subject line max 72 chars, imperative mood, no trailing period
    - Reference issue numbers when relevant
So it produces messages like:

    $ git diff HEAD~1 | bin/ai-commit-msg
    fix(guards): pass input to claude and tighten verdict handling
My issue with this kind of message is that it doesn't convey intent well enough. This kind of commit message will always be like "remove check from handleUser" instead of "fix authorization in xyz case". But I assume these are different schools of commits -- I prefer commits which convey WHY, not WHAT, much like source code comments.
I was looking at something similar. What does your agent-lib.sh look like?
Bump.

Would love to see your tiny agents project. But understand that it might contain something sensitive and will therefore stay private.

Ahh apologies

#!/usr/bin/env bash # agent-lib.sh — shared plumbing for all claude -p agents

AGENTS_DIR="${AGENTS_DIR:-$HOME/Code/github.com/craigjperry2/tiny-agents}" SKILLS_DIR="$AGENTS_DIR/skills" CLAUDE_OPTS="${CLAUDE_OPTS:-}"

# Build a system prompt by concatenating skill files # Usage: load_skills core/unix-output.md domain/git.md output/plain-text.md load_skills() { local combined="" for skill in "$@"; do local path="$SKILLS_DIR/$skill" if [[ -f "$path" ]]; then combined+=$'\n\n'"$(cat "$path")" else echo "[agent-lib] WARNING: skill not found: $skill" >&2 fi done echo "$combined" }

# Core invocation: reads stdin, prepends system prompt, calls claude -p # Usage: run_agent <system_prompt> [extra claude opts...] run_agent() { local system_prompt="$1" shift local stdin_content stdin_content=$(cat) # buffer stdin

    if [[ -z "$stdin_content" ]]; then
        echo "[agent] ERROR: no input on stdin" >&2
        exit 1
    fi

    # Combine system prompt with stdin as user message
    printf '%s' "$stdin_content" \
        | claude -p \
            --system-prompt "$system_prompt" \
            --output-format text \
            $CLAUDE_OPTS \
            "$@"
}

# Run agent then pipe through a guard # Usage: run_agent_guarded <guard_name> <system_prompt> run_agent_guarded() { local guard="$1" shift local system_prompt="$1" shift

    local output
    output=$(run_agent "$system_prompt" "$@")
    local agent_exit=$?

    if [[ $agent_exit -ne 0 ]]; then
        echo "$output"
        exit $agent_exit
    fi

    # Pass through guard
    echo "$output" | "$AGENTS_DIR/guards/$guard"
    exit $?
}

# For structured output: run agent then validate with jq run_json_agent() { local system_prompt="$1" shift run_agent "$system_prompt" --output-format text "$@" | guard-json-valid }

That is probably a private repo? 404, so not something I can access