[spenczar5]

That's a pretty interesting idea! I guess 160+ is sort of doing some of that for us - it compiles to SQL WHERE clauses, right - but generally, we found good results giving it a SQL dialect directly.

I think some of the reason is that there's so much coverage of writing SQL in its training set.

[hwernetti]

Good point, that makes a lot of sense to use a tool that has plenty of sample usage data available.