[davorak]

> Where does the line fall?

For now I would argue when ai edits for you instead of helping you edit. Take a look at the examples that Dang posted if you have not yet: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47342616

The first 5 I looked at were pretty egregious and not subtle.

[mlhpdx]

Yes, I have also done the search and found that the beta on "LLM!" objections is very high; often seeming wrong as right.

[davorak]

As of this comment which ones are you finding wrong? 5 of the first 7 are confessed ai users, the other 2 look like ai to me too.

[mlhpdx]

When I said "I have also done the search" I meant this simple one: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=1&prefix=false&qu...

[davorak]

Dang's search is much more clear cut and I think that is going to be better guide to what the enforcement will look like.

Looking at your search though I think we have to exclude today or at least this thread to get a fair look how llm generated is thrown around or not https://hn.algolia.com/?dateEnd=1773187200&dateRange=custom&...

Most of the comments I saw on the first page are not an accusation but there are some there 2 of the 3 I looked at looked pretty clear cut, while the 3rd was poorly written hype which looks like llm output, but I have seen similar from humans before at least from what I read, in either case it was flagged appropriately.