|
|
|
|
|
|
by protocolture
107 days ago
|
|
|
>Directly competing with those whose data was copied. An LLM doesnt compete with Art the same way that Photoshop doesnt compete with Art. >All of it, from everyone. With the result that anything produced by the LLM does not reproduce any single source in its entirety (and where compelled if they are able to do that is a bug not a feature) Fair use is too specific tbh, rather than ruling it fair use (which seems to be where things are going) it should just be ruled "use". There's nothing wrong with building a mathematical model using available data. |
|
|
Yes, it does. Many people are using AI-generated works in places where they originally would have either paid an artist, programmer, or other creative professional, or done without. Many companies are claiming to reduce staff because of AI (whether that's true or an excuse). There is plenty of evidence that AI is directly competing with various individuals, businesses, and industries.
> With the result that anything produced by the LLM does not reproduce any single source in its entirety
You do not have to reproduce sources in their entirety to produce derivative works.